Upper Patuxent River
Watershed Restoration
Action Strategy
In the conduct of this WRAS, Anne Arundel and Prince George’s Counties worked
closely with State staff to collect existing information and develop a watershed characterization,
and to field assess current stream habitat conditions, fish and aquatic invertebrate communities,
and baseflow nutrient concentrations and loading rates. Additionally, the WRAS Partners (Anne Arundel
and Prince George’s Counties, and Maryland DNR) undertook public participation activities to
ascertain the perceived issues and assets associated with the Upper Patuxent River watershed.
The urban land within this watershed was also reviewed and assessed for the potential to retrofit
or implement environmentally sensitive, low impact, development techniques that will address
and reduce nonpoint source pollution from site runoff. From the existing information and
current assessments, the WRAS Partners developed the Basin Condition Score, a methodology to
prioritize subwatersheds for restoration and/or protection activities based on differences in
ecological conditions (e.g., water quality, habitat conditions, land uses).
Based upon the work described above, a total of 63 restoration projects were identified in the
Upper Patuxent River Watershed in Anne Arundel County. Excess stream erosion was the most
frequently observed problem, followed by fish barriers and trash dumps. Habitat restoration
project needs were observed in all subwatersheds assessed except for a subwatershed contained
on the Patuxent Research Refuge.
Note:
(Documents are in PDF format and require Adobe Acrobat Reader which can be downloaded free from
http://www.adobe.com)
Anne Arundel County Volume
Body of report:
Appendix A:
Appendix B:
Appendix C:
Appendix D:
Prince George’s County Volume
Body of report:
Appendix A:
Appendix B:
Appendix C:
Appendix D:
WRAS Supporting Documents:
Field Application of a Method to Determine the
Feasibility and Potential Benefits of Implementing Low
Impact Development Techniques and Retrofitting
Convential Storm Water Practices in Developed Areas
The Upper Patuxent River Watershed is located in northeastern Prince George’s County and
western Anne Arundel County. The main stem of the river forms the boundary between the
counties of Prince George’s and Anne Arundel. The watershed has a drainage area of 88 square
miles, with 52 square miles in Prince George’s County. In the State’s 1998 Unified Watershed
Assessment, the Upper Patuxent was listed as a Category 1 Priority Watershed when it failed two
of the five water quality indicators. Watershed landscape indicators of water quality that had
poor scores included percent of impervious surface, population density, soil erodibility, benthic
index of biotic integrity, in-stream habitat and imperiled aquatics species indicator. All these
watershed indicators can be directly correlated with urban and transportation corridor-related
development.
To address the identified water quality issues, Prince George’s and Anne Arundel Counties
developed a Watershed Restoration Action Strategy (WRAS) proposal for the Upper Patuxent
River. The Counties proposed to develop a plan to target areas for the development of potential
storm water management sites. Implementation of the plan will help mitigate the effects of
uncontrolled runoff to the Patuxent River through the use of innovative and environmentally-sensitive
development techniques and state-of-the-art storm water management practices.
Targeting of the mitigation efforts will be based on stream corridor, biological and water quality
assessments. These assessments will help to identify stream reaches in need of physical
rehabilitation and provide needed information to be used in the prioritization of stream
rehabilitation projects.
Note:
(Documents are in PDF format and require Adobe Acrobat Reader which can be downloaded free from
http://www.adobe.com)
Part One: Anne Arundel County Results
(Appendix B of Strategy)
Body of report:
Appendix A:
Appendix B:
Appendix C:
Appendix D:
Appendix D Title Page
(25 KB PDF file)
Site 29 (Federal Express) (1,254 KB PDF file)
Site 31 (1,783 KB PDF file)
Site 32 (1,850 KB PDF file)
Site 33 (1,215 KB PDF file)
Site 34 (1,332 KB PDF file)
Site 35 (Richardson Building) (1,481 KB PDF file)
Site 36 (1,413 KB PDF file)
Site 37 (Crofton Bowling Centre) (1,260 KB PDF file)
Site 38 (1,771 KB PDF file)
Site 41 (Priest Bridge Overlook) (964 KB PDF file)
Site 42 (Priest Bridge Buildings) (1,600 KB PDF file)
Site 43 (Priest Bridge Station) (1,369 KB PDF file)
Site 45 (934 KB PDF file)
Site 46 (801 KB PDF file)
Site 48 (1,199 KB PDF file)
Part Two: Prince George’s County Results
(Appendix B of Strategy)
Body of report:
Appendix A:
Appendix B:
Appendix C:
Appendix D:
Appendix E:
Return to "WRAS" page
Updated on April 20, 2004